Greetings!Perhaps you have a piece or two that you think would be useful to other UUs but you really don't want to start your own blog. Naked SAMADHI is here to help!
If have some material you think is appropriate, please feel free to send it along to me (with copyright notice on the bottom – see mine for a sample form). Submissions can range from book and movie reviews, to rants and raves, to a perspective on spiritual practice, to perspectives on lay ministry.
I take a look at your work and perhaps post it (no promises). If I do post it, you will get a byline. If necessary, I will to some simple for mating. Any images you use should be forwarded as separate attachments as well as embedded in the text. If you submit three or four thoughtful pieces, and are so inclined, I will be happy to invite you to be a guest blogger which will allow you to post whenever the fancy strikes. Just to keep up appearances, and because a guy has to have some standards, please take a look at the following before submitting:
- Content: We expect our posts to be thoughtful and promote a focus on spirituality, healthy church dynamics, church history, and so on. The only things that are off limits are political discussions and general UU material that can be found elsewhere (though I am happy to consider adding links to such sites on your recommendation). This does not mean that you can't be funny, clever or irreverent - just be brilliant. If you have questions about what type of material is acceptable, poke around and it should be fairly obvious.
- Look and feel. It is important that the visuals of the site be maintained and so if you can find your own visuals, so much the better. If not forward the piece to me and I will scout around. Photos should be interesting and colorful and have a professional appearance.
Other than that, let's have fun and work to the change the world one post at a time!
Thank your for your interest. I look forward to hearing from you.
Warm regards,
Matt
1 comment:
I have long appreciated Maslow's insights on which he based his theory of needs, but I've always had a problem with the idea that the being needs are luxuries. The definition of a need is that without it, an organism is less/not able to grow along its developmental arc, if not survive. An example of this difference is sex, as plenty of people have survived long times without sex, but there is something to an argument that levels intimacy of relationships and the prospect for progeny are severely curtailed without it.
While I was finishing my MA in psychology, I chanced upon an old article written by a man who was then APA president. (Alas, I have been unable to recall his name or find it again.) The article stated that the further in time between the initial urge to meet a need, and when actual physiologic damage happened, the more psychopathology one could find about that need. As an example, he offered the difference between the needs for urination and eating. Both are needs, but damage from urine backing up into the kidneys can happen in about 2 hours, vs starvation takes about 2 weeks. Accordingly, we find very little psychopathology about urination, and so much about food.
I offer that Maslow was correct about his hierarchal arrangement of needs, but what he got wrong was the criteria. I offer that ALL needs are equally needs, and not one is more important than the other, but some are more immediate. The further up the list, the longer it likely takes to meet the needs. Trancendance seems to take the better part of a lifetime, if we get to it even then. (The concept of reincarnation appeals for this---if at first you don't succeed, try, try, again.)
I think Maslow listing them as importance vs immediacy was him reflecting a major value of our culture; the easiest way to control people is to keep them with one or more needs pitted against each other. (Most of us have at one time or another chosen to tolerate some sacrifice of our need for self esteem in the workplace so as not to endanger our ability to provide for food, clothing and shelter.) Double binds such as these have long been seen in psychology as a most toxic source of stress. Research into the effects of the stress hormone cortisol is increasingly showing us that stress not only breaks our bodies down, we can't repair and grow beyond past damage until the coast is clear.
Because our culture makes the being needs seem as luxuries, and most of us are constantly on a treadmill chasing after the deficiency needs, we remain maleable and will sacrifice self-actualization and trancendance that would more likely free us from the yoke.
It is no coincidence that each of the few examples of people who have reached trancendance (MLK, Jr, Jesus, Ghandi, etc.,) have been radicals and revolutionaries, and terrifying to those holding power in their age. Our current system is no different and prefers there be as few such leaders as possible, and ones who emerge must hire body guards because their predecessors have tended to get killed for thier trouble.
I would not necessarily ask everyone to lead a nationwide or global movement, but encourage revolution in more subtle ways.
As part of my practice as a therapist, I routinely refer clients to "The Relaxation and Stress Reduction Workbook," (Davis, Eshelman, & McKay; New Harbinger Press) which is a collection of exercises designed to help people gain some control over one's own internal experience. (This is not suppress emotions, but be able to not have them take control, allowing wisdom to emerge when rationalism is imformed by the heart.) When people have such skills to call upon at any time, they become confident that they get to make clearheaded choices in life, and they get less vulnerable to external manipulations.
Further, I teach my ideas about Maslow's hierarchy and that yes, we all will still have to juggle varying priorities as needs emerge and are sated on different time scales, (much like the old image of a Vaudeville plate spinner.) But, if we know that ALL of our needs should get to included on the list, we can keep an eye to the longer term ones in the quieter moments between meals, chores, bills, homework and the distraction of entertainment. Having all the needs on the list allows us to make clearer choices about what we really need in the long run, and avoid the trap of functioning in crisis mode all the time.
I believe that as more people change thier perspectives as I have offered, there will be a critical mass effect that will change our broader culture in profound ways. I am not a visionary who can offer strategies of how it will all work out. But I am hopeful that these changes are for the better. I believe that if all people were freer, calmer, and more aware of thier own needs, it would make for deeper and richer communication, which might lead to more efficient means of everyone getting all thier needs met, at least eventually. I continue to wait and see while I work to subvert the dominant paradigm. Viva la revolucion!
Anna Davis, ARNP, MA
Post a Comment