Thursday, November 1, 2007

What are We Missing?

As we reflect on the spiritual marketplace in our modern, secularized world, there is no question that something is afoot. This week in Seattle an innovative trust and financial management company that serves families of extreme wealth rented the symphony hall to have alternative medicine expert Andrew Weil speak to its customers, potential customers, and their advisors on aging in one of its “Thought Forums”. Andrew Weil wasn't always so mainstream. In 1971 he first visited Esalen where he participated in then cutting edge seminars on health and human consciousness. His efforts and the efforts of other physicians and healthcare professionals and researchers who largely gathered under the initial aegis and leadership of Esalen brought alternative medicine to the United States and within a few short decades turned it into what is now referred to respectfully as "complimentary medicine."

The stuff that was on the very outer fringes of cultural acceptability only recently is becoming mainstream in some very important ways. Yet we as Unitarian Universalists are missing this cultural sea-change and dooming ourselves to fundamental and, I suspect, quite permanent, irrelevance. We sit back and dismiss these movements out of hand – this hunger people have for something of significance that feeds their souls. We see it as somehow too “woo-woo” or “New Age”. Yet in our complacency, the world is passing us by very, very quickly. The folks who consider themselves “spiritual but not religious”, some of whom are referred to as Cultural Creatives, constitute approximately 20% of our population and probably reflect an even larger percentage of the demographic in more hip, urban and liberal areas where many of our churches exist.

As sophisticated UUs, I have heard us scoff at those who race after chimeric “spiritual” fixes – like The Celestine Prophecy or The Secret or “What the Bleep Do We Know” – and yet people who are seeking comfort in these things, and other ideas that are even stranger, have a deep human longing to become more whole and more loving people whose lives are rooted in something deeper than the shallow materialism of our age. This “pop” spirituality speaks of something much more profound - a human tropism towards the spiritual. It speaks of something that is emerging in our culture that has profoundly ancient antecedents. It runs so deep that it might even be irreducibly embedded in structures of human consciousness or even the fabric of the universe itself. The problem is that these popular forms of spiritual expression are ill-formed, lack depth, and are concocted out of ideas that seem to us rational folk to be patently foolish, confused and magical. In short, a throw-back to pre-rational superstition.

And many of them are. And yet…

While this frothy spirituality oftentimes denies and condemns the deeper wisdom traditions, their ideas are the distant and sometimes barely recognizable relatives of the much deeper truths found in perennial philosophies and the paths of mystics in Christian, Islamic, Jewish, Buddhist, Taoist, and Hindu traditions, among others. While the airy ideas of these facile trends lack depth and discipline, they can serve as gateways for literally millions of people to possibilities of real spiritual depth and profound experience. In talking with many UUs, the story is the same. Plenty of visitors, but few stick. Could part of the reason be because we are so very close to what they are looking for on paper, but fall short of embodying that promise in action, particularly with respect to spirituality?

As a faith that ostensibly draws on these well-grounded and respected traditions, we as Unitarian Universalists have the opportunity to deeply explore and live these truths and thereby offer to the world a path of depth, integrity and real meaning. But this way requires that we take our spiritual calling as seriously as we take our political one. It requires that we truly acknowledge the sources, not just with affirmation, but with incarnation. It requires discipline and study and devotion to spiritual practice.

Our denomination runs the risk of being swept into irrelevance. It continues to shrink in most appreciable ways and it is rapidly aging. We live in deadened humanism and narrow definitions of liberal political orthodoxy that have already been dismissed by our culture as fundamentally irrelevant. At this point, we have no voice that is resonating with those around us. Yet in our Sources we have latent depth and profound messages that, if taken seriously and coupled with spiritual practice, can not only revitalize our congregations but drive a new message of relevant political and social transformation.

Many leaders of cultural thinking point to emerging structures of consciousness that profoundly integrate the spiritual, the psychological, the intellectual and the ethical dimensions of life in ways that shape the soul. While this emerging consciousness is clearly not a panacea, and will raise its own problems, we are on the cusp of a revolution in the way ordinary people construct the meaning of their lives. It would be a shame to sit on the sidelines and only watch when we have the very real potential of dynamically participating in the emergence of a new order of human consciousness.

© 2007. Matthew Wesley. All rights reserved.

6 comments:

Robin Edgar said...

Very good post.

Many U*Us are not just sitting on the sidelines though. Most regrettably, many U*Us are opposed to participating in the emergence of a new order of human consciousness and even actively attempt to suppress it. . .

Kitty said...

I understand this sentiment, but I'm not sure if I would say that UUism risks irrelevance because we shy away from "new" spiritual explorations.

Of course, I don't think most of these things are "new" either. From the Celestine Prophecy to The Secret in particular, I've read/heard about movements with those base ideologies ever since I can remember--they just seem to get repackaged every 10-15 years or so.

But rather I think *some* of the problem lies with the fact that UU often represents and encourages people to believe that we're a spiritual path of fleeing from something else. (I also think that's the basic reason you can sometimes find the vitriolic hatred of the "mainstream" or our perception of the "mainstream"-- if someone is having their fight or flight reaction triggered, they'll respond with fear/hatred/anger) People might use "feeling/freedom from" as a very valuable stepping stone, but most people outgrow than and then move on. Maybe that's part of the problem we're facing in UUland? Aside from common sense guidelines, what ARE our unifying points of faith and action?


These other things you've mentioned don't make any pretense towards a full-bodied, lifetime path of religion, as UUism claims to want to be. They're very simple things, really. From "how to get what you want" to "how to feel good and superior and hip" to "how to feel important".

I guess you could say ALL religions say this, but at least in the older, more established ones, there's also rituals and rhythms that can be relied upon.

UUs have pretty much severed their ties to the religion that spawned it--Christianity. Unfortunately I don't think we've tied into anything to take that place. We seem to worship one of the American ideals of free expression and general freedom--but without roots in *something* that quickly become empty and meaningless.

I enjoy being UU, not for UUism's sake, but because I am a solo practitioner of a very strange spiritual path, and it's really the only place I can find community. That's more than enough for me, because I personally don't seek cohesion or shared experience necessarily. But I think most people do crave some unity in belief, or ritual.

Perhaps that can be found in some congregations, but not in the greater whole. We're structured very much like the Southern Baptists from my observation (each church is an island, more or less) and face much the same organizational problems they are.

I'm not sure whether to be amused or horrified by that. :)

Matt Wesley said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Matt Wesley said...

Thanks for posting! Your points are well taken and I am not sure that we disagree. I think the form of "pop" spirituality has been around since the 1960s and has even deeper roots in US history.

I agree with your notion that many UUs are in reaction. I also couldn't agree more with you that the things I mentioned don't constitute a full blown religious path - indeed, I think that they represent an impulse more than anything else. What they lack is the definition and depth offered by what we look to as our sources.

For many people who are drawn towards this "pop" spirituality, I think they long for this depth but don't really find it in our church. I am pretty sure that we, as UUs, aren't looking for a unified belief but rather a means to create an integrative framework. That framework would allow for a multiplicity of perspectives but would also aknowledge that, given what we as human beings have learned so far, we have some pretty good suspicions about the nature of life and what constitutes an authentic spiritual path. These suspicions wouldn't rise to the level of absolute truth, but they would replace the goofy late 20th century notion that every idea is as good as every other idea. That unwillingness to exercise good judgment seems to infect so much of the pluralistic mindset where every opinion is given equal weight.

Kitty said...

I think it will be interesting to see the organizational dynamics of supporting this "integrative framework."

It's one thing to turn an institution on its head and take it in a different direction from within.

But with us, wouldn't we have to do the opposite, where we take all these very different "insides" and try to flip the around to make a structural outside?

Maybe in that case, it would be interesting to take some lessons from "Eastern" religion, since those *tend* to be about uniting a bunch of very independent and varied schools of thought (that sometimes don't even share a common "holy text"!) into a shared framework. (I'm thinking of Buddhism and Hinduism here, specifically...and of course, generalizing a ton!)

I guess it's in thinking about this I see one of our biggest weaknesses...we seem to be pretty hung up on mixing/using interchangably religion and American politics. I agree that one's viewpoint on politics is by necessity going to be shaped by one's beliefs. But if you look at what is happening in the American evangelical church because of their entanglement/interchanging "Christian Conservative" with "Republican"...I wonder if that's not happening in some sense with us too.

It's definitely both exciting and scary to think about, as far as how to create that larger framework that can stand for itself, rather than be very tied to one particular ideology of politics, ect.

Bruce Dickson said...

Hi Matthew, this is good. What's missing to my eye in 2019 is awareness of and discussion of the lack of Best Practices in Group Process Formats in most UU services and most churches generally.

I self-oublished some books and scripits on this. Let me know if you wish conversation or digital copies.